俱舍論記 1.175

1.175

「此難不然至變礙義成」者，釋。五識依緣皆應積集，故無現在獨住極微，由恒積集故有變礙。然《正理》第二有兩說。一說同此論。又一說云：有說亦有獨住極微，然能變礙而不發識。五識依緣要積集故。如立極微，雖無方分亦無觸對，而許極微有礙、有對，有障用故。應知變礙義亦如是。

"This objection is incorrect, […] the meaning of transformation and resistance is established": This is the explanation. The bases and objects of the five consciousnesses must all be aggregated; therefore, there is no presently existing single, isolated atom. Because they are constantly aggregated, they have transformation and resistance. However, the Nyāyānusāra, fascicle 2, gives two explanations. One explanation is the same as this treatise. Another explanation says: 'Some say there are also single, isolated atoms, yet they are capable of transformation and resistance without generating consciousness, because the bases and objects of the five consciousnesses must necessarily be aggregated. Just as in establishing an atom, although it has no spatial parts (dig-bhāga-bheda) and no physical contact, it is accepted that an atom has resistance and impact, because it has an obstructive function (āvaraṇa-kāritra). The meaning of transformation and resistance should be understood to be likewise.'