俱舍論記 10.46

10.46

「有餘師說至故標名稱」者，第四解。無色四蘊，捨此身已轉趣未來餘受生處，轉變如名，故標名稱。無漏四蘊雖不受生，是此類故，名攝無失。初解約易境名轉變，後解約易生名轉變。雖義差別，俱約轉變釋名。又《正理》二十九云「佛說無色四蘊名名。何故名名？能表召故。謂能表召種種所緣。若爾，不應全攝無色，不相應法無所緣故。不爾，表召唯在無色，如釋色名所說無過。佛說變礙故名為色。去來、無表及諸極微，雖無變礙而得名色，以無色中無變礙故，變礙名色非不極成。如是無色中容有表召，非色中有故，理亦無違。故不相應名攝無失。更有三解，不能具述。

[On the Kośa's statement:] "Other teachers say: [... therefore they are designated by the appellation 'name']": this is the fourth explanation. The four non-material aggregates, having abandoned this body, change and proceed to subsequent places of rebirth in the future; their changing and proceeding is like a name, and therefore they are designated by the appellation "name". Although the four untainted aggregates do not take rebirth, because they belong to this category, their inclusion under "name" is without fault. The first explanation explains changing in terms of changing objects; the latter explanation explains changing in terms of changing rebirths. Although the meanings differ, both explain "name" in terms of changing and bending (nam-). Furthermore, the Nyāyānusāra, fascicle 29, says: "The Buddha taught that the four non-material aggregates are called 'name'. Why are they called 'name'? Because they are capable of indicating and summoning. That is, they can indicate and summon various objects. If so, they should not entirely subsume non-material [phenomena], for non-associated phenomena have no object. It is not so: indicating and summoning applies only to non-material phenomena, just as there is no fault in what was stated in explaining the designation of form. The Buddha said that 'form' is named because of mutability and resistance. Past, future, non-informative matter, and subtle atoms, though lacking mutability and resistance, still obtain the name 'form'; because among non-material phenomena there is no mutability and resistance, the designation of form through mutability and resistance is not unestablished. In the same way, among non-material phenomena there is room for indicating and summoning, whereas in material phenomena there is none; therefore, in principle, there is also no contradiction. Hence, the inclusion of non-associated formations under 'name' is without fault." There are three further explanations, which cannot be recounted in detail.