俱舍論記 10.8

10.8

「為顯有體至如非親實等」者，前二有過，論主正解，為顯無明有體，無非有過。義不濫餘眼等，無眼等失。明所對治，名曰無明，如非親等。

"To show that it has a substance... as in the case of 'non-friend', 'untrue', and so on": the previous two positions had faults, so the master of the treatise provides the correct explanation. In order to show that ignorance has a substance, there is no fault of nonexistence. Its meaning is not confused with other things such as the eyes, so there is no fault of [it being identical to] the eyes and so on. That which is the counteragent to knowledge is called ignorance, just like 'non-friend' and so on.