俱舍論記 13.199

13.199

「無如是過失至理亦無違」者，經部答。無有如是見所斷失。如四大種非由心引成善、不善，以非故心起大種故，與能引心性不同故，非是見斷。有漏色業與能引心同染污故是見所斷，作不齊解。或許四大見所斷引，即見道斷，理亦無違。

"There is no such fault... nor is there any contradiction in logic": the Sautrāntika answers. There is no such fault of being abandoned through seeing. Just as the four great elements do not become wholesome or unwholesome through the mind's inducement—because the great elements are not aroused by an intentional mind and because their nature is not identical to that of the inducing mind—they are not abandoned through seeing. Sāsrava matter-actions are abandoned through seeing because they share the defiled nature of the inducing mind; thus he provides an asymmetrical explanation. Or, if one concedes that the four great elements induced by [a mind] abandoned through seeing are also abandoned through the path of seeing, there is likewise no contradiction in logic.