俱舍論記 13.83

13.83

「又非自作至此性無異故」者，此是第四非自作業證。又非自作身二、語四，但遣他為。若無無表業，不應成業道。以遣他表非彼業道攝。由此表業但加行，未能正作所作事故。使作殺等事已，此能教者，遣表業性復無異故。既無別類身、語業生，則遣他為應無業道。實成業道，故知爾時更別引生無表業道。

"Furthermore, not doing it oneself [...] because this nature is not different": this is the fourth proof from karma not done by oneself. Furthermore, one does not do the two bodily and four vocal [actions] oneself, but merely dispatches another to do them. If there were no uninformative karma, they should not constitute paths of karma. For the informative [karma] of dispatching another is not subsumed under that path of karma, because this informative karma is merely a preliminary application, and is not yet the actual performance of the action to be done. Once the one who was dispatched performs the act of killing or the like, the nature of the informative karma of the commander who dispatched him does not differ. Since no different class of bodily or vocal karma has arisen, then dispatching another to act should entail no path of karma. Yet in fact it does constitute a path of karma; therefore we know that at that time, a separate path of uninformative karma has been engendered.