俱舍論記 14.102

14.102

「有餘師說至分為二故」者，敘異說。此師意說：離非時食是正齋體，西方國俗斷食名齋。餘有八種不名為齋，非齋義故，但名齋支。分二可知。若依此解，即有九戒。而言八戒者，不據體說，但約支論。問：齋與近住梵名同不？解云：文既別說，明知不同。又解：梵名鄔波婆娑，或翻為齋、或翻近住，名異義同。

"Other masters say... because it is divided into two" recounts a divergent view. This master's meaning is: abstaining from eating at improper times is the primary substance of fasting (upavāsa); according to the custom of the western countries, abstaining from food is called fasting. The remaining eight types are not called fasting because they lack the meaning of fasting; they are merely called limbs of fasting. Dividing them into two is readily understood. According to this explanation, there are nine precepts. When it is said there are eight precepts, it is not said on the basis of substance, but only discussed in terms of limbs. Question: Are the Sanskrit names for fasting (upavāsa) and abiding near (upavāsa) the same? The answer: Since the text explains them separately, clearly they are not the same. Another explanation: The Sanskrit name is *upavāsa*, which is translated either as fasting or as abiding near; the names differ, but the meaning is the same.