俱舍論記 14.41

14.41

「若爾世尊至以何為自性」者，此下第三通經二律儀，依經起問。若唯身、語名律儀者，何故世尊所說略戒，身、語、意三俱名律儀而嘆善哉？言遍律儀，總說三種。又契經中何故復說眼根律儀？此前經說意律儀，此後經說眼根律儀，以何為自性？

Regarding "If so, why did the World-Honoured One... what is their intrinsic nature?": from here down is the third [section], reconciling the two disciplines mentioned in the sūtras, posing a question based on scripture. If only bodily and vocal [actions] are called discipline, why did the World-Honoured One, in stating the summary discipline, designate all three—body, speech, and mind—as discipline and praise them as excellent? In speaking of all-encompassing discipline, all three kinds are spoken of collectively. Furthermore, why does the sūtra also speak of the discipline of the eye faculty? The former sūtra spoke of the mental discipline, and the latter sūtra spoke of the eye faculty's discipline; what is their intrinsic nature?