俱舍論記 15.195

15.195

「若從餘定至非勝福田」者，簡差別。餘定，謂除前五定，是所餘定。餘果，謂四果中除初、後果，是餘次第。一來、不還果若從餘定出時，由前所修定非殊勝。若從餘果出時，見所斷惑先已斷故，修所斷惑未畢竟盡，故彼相續於初出位非勝福田，為損、益時非受即果。若預流果，雖不能斷修惑究竟，以斷見惑究竟盡故；若阿羅漢，雖見惑先斷，以斷修惑究竟盡故。所以從彼初出之時損、益業即受。此言預流勝中二者，據初出勝。若據餘時四果相望，即二果勝預流也。

"If emerging from other absorptions... are not supreme fields of merit": this differentiates the distinctions. "Other absorptions" refers to the remaining absorptions apart from the aforementioned five absorptions. "Other fruits" refers to the remaining intermediate [fruits] among the four fruits, excluding the first and last fruits: the once-returner and the non-returner. If emerging from other absorptions, because the previously cultivated absorption was not exceptional; and if emerging from other fruits, because the afflictions abandoned by seeing were already severed previously, while the afflictions abandoned by cultivation are not yet completely exhausted—therefore, that continuum in the state of first emerging is not a supreme field of merit, and when one harms or benefits it, one does not experience an immediate fruit. In the case of the stream-enterer, although they cannot sever the afflictions of cultivation completely, it is because they have severed the afflictions of seeing completely and exhaustively; and in the case of the arhat, although the afflictions of seeing were severed earlier, it is because they have severed the afflictions of cultivation completely and exhaustively. Therefore, when first emerging from them, karma that harms or benefits is experienced immediately. This statement that the stream-enterer is superior to the middle two [fruits] is based on [the state of] first emerging. If based on other times when comparing the four fruits with one another, the two fruits are superior to the stream-enterer.