俱舍論記 16.114

16.114

「破我論中至其理決然」者，答。執有實我指同下破，引頌意證身是命者。言三捨身故有命根。身名有命者，無命根名死其理決然，非別有我命屬於彼。故《正理》云「如伽陀說壽煖等言，故有命身名身命者，非實有我。其理決然。」

"In the refutation of the self […] the principle is definitively so": this is the reply. The grasp of a real self is referred to as being refuted below in the same way, quoting the meaning of the verse to prove that the body is the "living one". Because it is said that the three [factors] abandon the body, there is a vital faculty. The body is termed "having life", and the absence of the vital faculty is termed death—this principle is definitively so; there is no separate self to which life belongs. Therefore, the Nyāyānusāra says: "As the verse speaks of life, warmth, and so forth, a body possessing life is called a living body; there is no real self. This principle is definitively so."