俱舍論記 16.118

16.118

「論曰至不與取罪」者，此明具五緣成盜。於前殺緣，不誤及想，并彼故思，如其所應，流至後門業道相中，故盜等頌不重顯說。一謂要先發欲盜故思，簡無故思從前流來。二於他物，簡自物。自盜不成業道，是頌中他物。三起他物想，簡自物想。若於他物作自物想，不成業道。他物頌有，想前流來。又解：若想為一緣，後頌全無。四或強力劫、或復私竊起盜加行。從此至彼，簡無加行，是頌力竊。五不誤而取令屬己身，不誤簡誤，誤取不成業道。取屬己身、取顯離處，取屬己身頌文自有，不誤二字從前流來。齊此五緣方說名為不與取罪。

"The treatise says […] the sin of taking what is not given": this explains that possessing five conditions constitutes stealing. From the previous conditions of killing—not mistaking, perception, and prior intention—these carry over into the characteristics of the subsequent courses of action as appropriate; therefore the verses on stealing and so on do not restate them explicitly. First, one must first generate the prior intention desiring to steal, which excludes the absence of prior intention; this carries over from the previous. Second, regarding another's property, which excludes one's own property. Stealing one's own property does not constitute a course of action; this is "another's property" in the verse. Third, giving rise to the perception that it is another's property, which excludes the perception that it is one's own property. If one regards another's property as one's own property, it does not constitute a course of action. "Another's property" is in the verse; "perception" carries over from the previous. Another interpretation says: if perception is counted as one condition, it is completely absent from the subsequent verse. Fourth, initiating the preliminary action of stealing either by taking by force or by taking in secret. Moving it from this place to that place excludes the absence of preliminary action; this is "by force or stealth" in the verse. Fifth, taking it without mistaking so as to appropriate it to oneself. "Without mistaking" excludes mistaking; taking by mistake does not constitute a course of action. "Taking possession of it to oneself" indicates displacement; "taking possession of it to oneself" is present in the verse text itself; the two words "without mistaking" carry over from the previous. Only when these five conditions are completely present is it called the sin of taking what is not given.