俱舍論記 16.13

16.13

「諸無漏業至性相違故」者，釋第四句。諸無漏業能斷前三名為非黑，不染污故。亦名非白，以不能招白異熟故。此非白言，據不能招白異熟果，且據一相，是佛密意說，非真了義。若據顯說亦名為白，經說無學法名白，論說不染污法名白。以此故知，諸無漏法亦名為白。而言無漏無異熟者，不墮三界故、與墮三界流轉生死法性相違故，所以不能感異熟果。

Regarding "All anāsrava karma... because their natures are contradictory": This explains the fourth line. All anāsrava karmas can sever the previous three; they are called "non-dark" because they are undefiled. They are also called "non-white" because they cannot bring about white vipāka. This expression "non-white" is based on their inability to bring about white vipāka results; relying on this single characteristic, it is a statement of the Buddha's intentional meaning, not the definitive, explicit meaning. If based on explicit teaching, it is also called "white": the sūtra states that aśaikṣa dharmas are called "white", and the treatise states that undefiled dharmas are called "white". From this it is known that all anāsrava dharmas are also called "white". As for the statement that the anāsrava has no vipāka: because it does not fall within the three realms, and because its nature is contradictory to the dharmas that fall within the three realms and transmigrate in saṃsāra, it therefore cannot produce a vipāka result.