俱舍論記 16.162

16.162

「有餘師說至雜穢語收」者，釋第五、第六句。此師意說：異前三語染心所發方名雜穢，皆是獨起雜穢語也。前三語起時不兼雜穢，有此不同故敘異說。文顯可知。或可雜穢亦有不誤，如欲期心諂佞於彼，誤諂餘人，亦可不成業道。若據斯義，或具四緣。然前解為勝。

Regarding "Other masters say ... are subsumed under frivolous talk": This explains the fifth and sixth lines. What this master means to say is: only what is uttered with a defiled mind distinct from the previous three vocal [actions] is called frivolous talk; these are all independently arising frivolous talk. When the previous three vocal [actions] arise, they do not include frivolous talk; because there is this difference, the divergent opinion is recounted. The text is clear and understandable. Alternatively, frivolous talk also has [the condition of] absence of error: for example, intending to flatter one person but erroneously flattering someone else might also not constitute a course of karma. If based on this meaning, it would possess four conditions. However, the former explanation is superior.