俱舍論記 17.63

17.63

「依不異心至決判應知」者，答。前文中云偷盜業道貪究竟者，依不異心所作究竟。謂此偷盜有二種貪，一因等起、二剎那等起。後剎那等起貪究竟時，與前因等起貪同是貪故，名依不異心所作究竟。後文言嗔亦究竟盜者，依別異心所作究竟。謂此偷盜嗔究竟，以與彼偷盜因等起貪嗔、貪不同，名依異心所作究竟。前、後各據一義，故作如是決判應知。又解：後文中言嗔能究竟。殺、盜二種依不異心所作究竟，謂殺、盜二同一嗔心所作究竟，故云依不異心所作究竟。前文中言盜貪究竟，依前異心所作究竟，謂盜以貪究竟、若殺以嗔究竟，各依一心，貪與嗔不同，名依異心所作究竟。故作如是決判應知。

Regarding "It is based on being performed with the same mind up to should be known as a definitive judgment": this is an answer. When it was stated in the earlier text that the course of action of theft is culminated by greed, this was based on culmination performed with an undifferentiated mind. That is to say, in this theft there are two kinds of greed: first, causal origination, and second, momentary origination. When the subsequent greed of momentary origination culminates it, because it is the same greed as the prior greed of causal origination, it is called culmination performed based on an undifferentiated mind. When the later text states that hatred also culminates theft, this is based on culmination performed with a different mind. That is to say, in this theft, hatred culminates it; because hatred and greed are distinct from the greed of causal origination of that theft, it is called culmination performed based on a different mind. The earlier and later [passages] each rely on one meaning; therefore, you should know that this definitive judgment was made in this way. Another explanation: The statement in the later text that hatred can culminate both killing and stealing is based on culmination performed with an undifferentiated mind—meaning that both killing and stealing are culminated by the same single mind of hatred; hence it says 'culmination performed based on an undifferentiated mind'. The statement in the earlier text that theft is culminated by greed is based on culmination performed with a different mind—meaning that theft is culminated by greed, whereas killing is culminated by hatred; each relying on a single mind, greed and hatred being distinct, it is called culmination performed based on a different mind. Therefore, you should know that this definitive judgment was made in this way.