俱舍論記 18.100

18.100

「謂無貪俱至總立以施名」者，答。謂無貪俱時能起此身、語業，心、心所法聚，名為能發。又解：謂無貪俱時心、心所法，能起此身、語業聚，彼能起者名為能發。前解為勝。引頌證意。剎那善五蘊總立施名。此言剎那，非一剎那，據怛剎那。取能發因等起心、心所法四蘊，及所發身、語色蘊，前、後善五蘊總名剎那。又解：此頌據剎那等起，故言此剎那善五蘊總立以施名。問：如《婆沙》二十九解財供養體云「評曰：應作是說。若所捨財，若能捨者身、語二業，若能發彼心、心所法，若受者受已諸根大種造色增長，皆此自性。如是財供養總用五蘊以為自性。」准《婆沙》文，亦取所捨財為施體。何故此論不取財耶？解云：《婆沙》評家通出財施體故，通取捨財及諸根等。此論偏據真施體故，言捨具名施。

"It refers to [...] are collectively designated by the name 'giving'": the answer. It means the collection of mind and mental factors contemporaneous with non-greed that can give rise to these bodily and vocal actions is called the motivating factors. Another explanation: The mind and mental factors contemporaneous with non-greed that can give rise to this collection of bodily and vocal actions—those that can give rise are called the motivating factors. The former explanation is superior. A verse is cited to corroborate the meaning: the wholesome five aggregates of a moment are collectively designated by the name "giving". The word "moment" (kṣaṇa) here does not mean a single instant (ekakṣaṇa), but is based on tatkṣaṇa (that period). Taking the four aggregates of mind and mental factors that motivate as originating cause, and the physical aggregate of bodily and vocal actions produced by them, the preceding and succeeding wholesome five aggregates are collectively called a moment. Another explanation: This verse is based on originating in a moment, hence it says that these wholesome five aggregates of a moment are collectively designated by the name "giving". Question: As the Vibhāṣā, fascicle 29, explains the intrinsic nature of the offering of material goods: "Critique: It should be said like this. Whether it be the renounced wealth, the bodily and vocal actions of the giver, the mind and mental factors that motivate them, or the increase of derived materiality of the faculties and great elements after the recipient receives it—all are its intrinsic nature. Thus the offering of material goods collectively takes the five aggregates as its intrinsic nature." According to the text of the Vibhāṣā, it also takes the renounced wealth as the intrinsic nature of giving. Why does this treatise not take wealth? Explanation: Because the arbiter in the Vibhāṣā broadly identifies the intrinsic nature of material giving, it comprehensively includes the renounced wealth and the faculties, and so forth. This treatise is specifically based on the true intrinsic nature of giving, and therefore says that the means of renunciation is called giving.