俱舍論記 18.56

18.56

「若造無間至定相違故」者，此即第四明加行定。無間加行若必定成，中間決無離染、得果，以彼業強次生必受。此離染道及得果道，不能令彼業道不起，故決定無離染、得果。應知無間加行有二：一可轉、二不可轉，此中據不可轉者為問。故《顯宗論》二十三云「然我所宗，無間加行總說有二：一近、二遠。近不可轉，遠有轉義（解云：諸論言可轉，據遠說。諸論言不可轉，據近說。廣如《正理》、《婆沙論》說），除無間業。若造餘惡業道，加行中間若聖道生，業道不起。轉至聖位所依止身，與彼惡業道定相違故。以彼業道劣、聖道力強，能令此業不得現起，故得入聖。離染道劣，不能令彼惡業不起。」又解：不言離染，略而不論。

Regarding "If one commits an anantarya [...] because they are definitely incompatible": this is the fourth [section], clarifying the determination of preparatory effort. If an anantarya's preparatory effort is definitely to culminate, in the interim there is absolutely no separation from passion or attainment of the fruit, because that karma is powerful and must be experienced in the subsequent life. This path of separation from passion and path of attaining the fruit cannot prevent that path of karma from arising; therefore, separation from passion and attainment of the fruit are definitely absent. It should be understood that the preparatory effort for an anantarya is of two kinds: first, reversible; second, irreversible. Here the question is based on the irreversible. Thus fascicle 23 of the *Abhidharmasamayapradīpikā* states: "However, according to our school, preparatory effort for an anantarya is generally spoken of as two: proximate and remote. The proximate is irreversible, while the remote has the sense of being reversible (Explanation: When treatises say it is reversible, they speak on the basis of the remote; when treatises say it is irreversible, they speak on the basis of the proximate, as detailed in the *Nyāyānusāra* and *Mahāvibhāṣā*), with the exception of anantarya karma. If one commits other unwholesome paths of karma, if the noble path arises in the interim of the preparatory effort, the path of karma does not arise. The body on which one relies that has transformed to the noble state is definitely incompatible with that unwholesome path of karma. Because that path of karma is weak and the power of the noble path is strong, it can prevent this karma from becoming manifest; therefore, one is able to enter nobility. The path of separation from passion is weak and cannot prevent that unwholesome karma from arising." Another explanation: it does not mention separation from passion because it is omitted for brevity and not discussed.