俱舍論記 18.66

18.66

「有異熟業至二喻如前」者，此即大文第五明三時障。於不定業中亦應除少分，以半為障半不障故，所以不說。故《正理》四十三云「然於此中除順現受及順不定受異熟不定業，并異熟定中非異處熟者。」以此准知，順生受業、順後受業及順不定受業中，異熟定、異處熟者皆能為障。餘文可知。

Regarding the passage from "Karma that possesses ripening" up to "the two similes are as before": this is the fifth major section, explaining the obstructions of the three times. A minor portion should also be excluded from indeterminate karma, because half acts as an obstruction and half does not act as an obstruction, which is why it is not discussed. Thus the *Nyāyānusāra*, fascicle 43, states: "However, herein are excluded karma to be experienced in the present life, karma indeterminate as to ripening that is to be experienced indeterminately, and among karma determinate as to ripening, that which does not ripen in another place." By inferring from this, one understands that among karma to be experienced in the next life, karma to be experienced in subsequent lives, and karma to be experienced indeterminately, that which is determinate as to ripening and ripens in another place can all act as an obstruction. The rest of the text can be understood.