俱舍論記 19.193

19.193

「然彼問者至應反詰記」者，此即論主釋通。然彼問者一向為問人為勝、劣？汝言亦勝亦劣，非一向記故，應成分別記，何名一向記？既不審知前人問意，但此應詰問意所方。若言方天，應記人劣；若言方下惡趣，應記人勝。故此名為應反詰記。

On the passage from "However, that questioner" to "should be answered by counter-questioning": here the author of the treatise resolves the issue. That questioner asked categorically: Are humans superior or inferior? If you say they are both superior and inferior, this is not a categorical answer, and therefore it should constitute an analytical answer; how could it be called a categorical answer? Since one does not thoroughly know the prior questioner's intent, one should only interrogate in which direction the question's intent lies. If they say relative to the gods, one should answer that humans are inferior; if they say relative to the lower, miserable destinies, one should answer that humans are superior. Therefore, this is called an answer to be given by counter-questioning.