俱舍論記 19.88

19.88

「由倒經故至是我所見」者，答。由《四倒經》作是說故。諸有計我於彼事中有自在力，是我所見。既於我外別說我所，明知我所非我倒攝。又解：此文有說引經證攝我所，我於彼事自在義邊是我所見，無有別體。

"Because of the Sūtra on the Inversions […] is the view of what belongs to self": this is the answer. Because the Sūtra on the Four Inversions states: 'Whatever imputes that a self has mastery over those objects is the view of what belongs to self.' Since it states the 'belonging to self' separately outside the 'self,' it is clearly known that what belongs to self is not subsumed under the inversion of self. Another explanation is: this passage is cited by [the proponent of] the other explanation from the sūtra to prove that it subsumes what belongs to self: in terms of the sense of the self having mastery over that object, it is the view of what belongs to self; there is no separate essence.