俱舍論記 19.89

19.89

「此即我見至見亦應別」者，有說釋經。此我所見，即是我見由我、我所二門轉故，所以別說。是我、是我見，第一轉聲。屬我，是我所見，第六轉聲。由我，謂由我如此，是第三轉聲。為我，謂為我如此，是第四轉聲。於八轉聲中，第一、第六若是別見，第三、第四見亦應別。三、四見既不殊，初、六見寧有異？

"This is itself the view of self […] the views should also be distinct": the other explanation interprets the sūtra: this view of what belongs to self is itself the view of self; because it operates through the two avenues of 'self' and 'belonging to self,' it is spoken of separately. 'Is the self' is the view of self, the first grammatical case (nominative). 'Belonging to the self' is the view of what belongs to self, the sixth case (genitive). 'By the self'—meaning 'by myself it is so'—is the third case (instrumental). 'For the self'—meaning 'for myself it is so'—is the fourth case (dative). Among the eight grammatical cases, if the first and the sixth were distinct views, then the views in the third and the fourth should also be distinct. Since the views in the third and fourth are not different, how could the views in the first and sixth differ?