俱舍論記 21.129

21.129

「諸忍皆是至同一果故」者，答。諸忍皆是智眷屬故，諸忍所作亦名智作，故忍得果、智得其名。如王眷屬左右所作，假立王名亦名王作。或忍與智同一離繫果，忍是能證、智是正證，雖是忍果亦名遍知。

"All receptivities are [...] because they have the identical fruit": this is the answer. Because all receptivities are retinue to knowledge, that which is done by receptivities is also called that which is done by knowledge; therefore, receptivity obtains the fruit, while knowledge receives the name. Just as that which is done by the retinue and attendants of a king is metaphorically designated with the king's name and also called that which is done by the king. Or, receptivity and knowledge share the identical fruit of disjunction (visaṃyoga-phala): receptivity is the capable realizer, while knowledge is the actual realizer; although it is a fruit of receptivity, it is also called universal knowledge.