俱舍論記 24.31

24.31

「此說非理太過失故」者，論主破。中、生般等亦緣有為，無為斷惑，亦應名為有行，無行。

Regarding 'This explanation is unreasonable, because it is overly broad': the author of the treatise refutes it. Intermediate parinirvāṇa, birth parinirvāṇa, and the others also take conditioned and unconditioned [phenomena] as objects to abandon defilements; they too should then be called 'with activity' and 'without activity'.