俱舍論記 26.33

26.33

「然說見言至亦是見」者，通本論文。以實而言，盡、無生智息求非見，以本論中解其十智一一皆言智見等八。至盡、無生猶說見者，乘言便故。又解：盡、無生智，若據息求即不名見，於諸諦理現照轉故亦名為見。由此本論亦作是言：且諸智亦是見。

Regarding "However, stating the word 'view' ... is also a view": this reconciles the text of the root treatise. In truth, because the knowledges of exhaustion and non-origination have brought investigation to rest, they are not views; but because in the root treatise, when explaining the ten knowledges, it says in each case the eight terms including knowledge and view, when coming to exhaustion and non-origination it still speaks of "view" simply for stylistic convenience. Another explanation: as for the knowledges of exhaustion and non-origination, if considered in terms of having brought investigation to rest, they are not called views; but because they operate as direct illumination upon the principles of the truths, they are also called views. For this reason, the root treatise also states: moreover, all knowledges are also views.