俱舍論記 26.83

26.83

「且止傍論至能緣行相不」者，止諍述宗。問：此所明他心智既知他心，為亦能取他心所緣色等境不？及亦取他心家能緣行相不？如有餘人緣彼他心，此餘人心名他心家能緣行相。

Regarding [the text from] “Let us stop the digression” up to “or its cognizing aspect?”: this stops the dispute and states their own tenet. Question: Since this knowledge of another's mind being explained knows another's mind, can it also grasp the objects such as visible forms that are the object of that other mind? And does it also grasp the cognizing aspect belonging to that other mind? As when another person takes that other mind as object, this other person's mind is called the cognizing aspect of that other mind.