俱舍論記 29.114

29.114

「又若實有至皆無有我」者，此下就正破中，第二以教破犢子。經言無我，汝言有我，豈不相違？此引初經牒破。

As for 'Furthermore, if it exists substantially... all are devoid of self': Below, within the main refutation, this is the second part: refuting the Vātsīputrīya by means of scripture. The sūtra says there is no self, while you say there is a self; is this not contradictory? This cites the first sūtra to examine and refute them.