俱舍論記 29.145

29.145

「又餘經說至妄分別為我」者，論主又出過。經言計我，於取蘊起，不言於我。故無依我起於我見。但非我法妄分別為我，何得說言不言於我？

"Furthermore, another sūtra says... falsely differentiating it as a self": the author of the treatise again points out the fault. The sūtra states that conceiving a self arises with respect to the appropriation-aggregates (upādāna-skandhas); it does not say it arises with respect to a self. Therefore, there is no arising of the view of self based on a self. It is merely falsely conceptualizing non-self phenomena as a self; how can you say it does not speak of a self?