俱舍論記 30.8

30.8

「誰言無有至修所斷故」者，論主通難。誰言無有化生有情？如佛所言：化生中有，我說有故。謂蘊相續能往後世，不由胎、卵、濕，名化生有情。撥此中有無，故邪見攝。化生五蘊理實有故，義便復徵。又許此邪見謗補特伽羅，是何所斷？見、修所斷。理並不然，汝執實我非四諦攝故，非見諦斷。又此邪見不應說言修所斷故。

"Who says there are none... because it is abandoned through cultivation": the author of the treatise resolves the objection. Who says there are no spontaneously born sentient beings? As the Buddha said: "I declare that spontaneously born intermediate beings exist." That is, the continuity of the skandhas capable of going to the next world without relying on a womb, an egg, or moisture is called a spontaneously born sentient being. Denying the existence of this intermediate state is subsumed under wrong view. Because the spontaneously born five skandhas are real in principle, he conveniently interrogates them further: Furthermore, if you hold that this wrong view slanders the pudgala, by what is it abandoned? Is it abandoned through seeing or through cultivation? Neither is logically admissible: since the real self you grasp is not subsumed under the four noble truths, it cannot be abandoned through seeing the truths. Furthermore, it should not be said that this wrong view is abandoned through cultivation.