俱舍論記 4.135

4.135

「論曰至所敵對法」者，諸功德謂戒、定等，有德者謂師長等。無敬等四，總顯不重。於前二境無敬、無崇，或於諸德無敬、於有德者無崇，或於有德者無敬、於諸功德無崇，於前二境無所忌難、無所隨屬。或於諸德無所忌難、於有德者無所隨屬，說名無慚，即是敬、慚所敵對法，以敬、慚為體故。

Regarding the passage from "The commentary says:" up to "its direct opponent dharmas": "Qualities" refers to morality, concentration, and so on; "the possessors of qualities" refers to teachers, preceptors, and so forth. The four phrases, beginning with "lack of respect", collectively indicate an absence of esteem. One lacks respect and esteem toward those former two objects; or, toward the qualities one lacks respect, and toward the possessors of qualities one lacks esteem; or, toward the possessors of qualities one lacks respect, and toward the qualities one lacks esteem. Toward those former two objects one lacks apprehension and deference; or, toward the qualities one lacks apprehension, and toward the possessors of qualities one lacks deference. This is called lack of shame (ahrīkyatā), which is the direct opponent dharma of respect and shame, having respect and shame as its [opposing] nature.