俱舍論記 4.137

4.137

「不見怖言至名不見怖」者，外難。不見怖言欲顯何義？為見彼罪怖果，而不怖畏，名不見怖？為不見彼罪怖果，名不見怖？又解：為見罪而不怖名不見怖？此問怖屬心，即緣境怯怖。為不見彼罪家怖果名不見怖？此問怖屬境，即所怖果。

Regarding the passage from "The expression 'not seeing what is dreadful'" up to "is called not seeing what is dreadful": This is an external objection: What meaning is the expression "not seeing what is dreadful" intended to convey? Does seeing the dreadful fruition of that fault and yet not being terrified by it count as "not seeing what is dreadful"? Or does not seeing that dreadful fruition of the fault count as "not seeing what is dreadful"? Another interpretation: Does seeing the fault and not being terrified count as "not seeing what is dreadful"? This question attributes the dread to the mind—namely, cowardice and dread directed toward the object. Does not seeing the dreadful fruition belonging to that fault count as "not seeing what is dreadful"? This question attributes the dread to the object—namely, the fruition that is dreaded.