俱舍論記 4.150

4.150

「有說敬者至故敬非慚」者，敘不正義。敬先、慚後，時既不同，敬非慚。《正理》第十一破此師云「彼師應許無慚恥者能起恭敬，以執先起敬時未有慚恥故。應無慚者能起恭敬，若謂敬時已有慚恥，則不應說由敬為先方生慚恥。若謂敬時非無慚恥，然敬非慚，此亦非理，言敬非慚，無證因故。

Regarding the passage from "Some say that respect" up to "therefore respect is not shame": This cites an incorrect view. Respect being first and shame being later, their timings being different, respect is not shame. Fascicle 11 of the Nyāyānusāra refutes this master, saying: "That master would have to admit that a shameless person can give rise to respect, because he maintains that when respect first arises, shame is not yet present. It would follow that a shameless person can give rise to respect. If one says that when respecting, shame is already present, then one should not say that shame arises only having respect as its precursor. If one says that when respecting, one is not devoid of shame, but respect is not shame, this too is unreasonable, for the assertion that respect is not shame lacks any proving reason."