俱舍論記 4.259

4.259

「若爾豈不有無窮過」者，難。得復有得，非得復有非得，豈不有無窮過，又解：準下答文，此唯問得。以現非得，無現非得，無無窮過，故不別問。

"If so, would there not be the fault of infinite regress?": this is an objection. If possession further has possession, and non-possession further has non-possession, would there not be the fault of infinite regress? Another explanation: In accordance with the text of the answer below, this asks only about possession. Because present non-possession has no present non-possession, there is no fault of infinite regress, so it does not separately ask [about that].