俱舍論記 5.186

5.186

「又住等三至為名壞滅」者，此下破住等三相。三相現用俱依一法，爾時此法為名安住？為名衰異？為名壞滅？《正理》救云「今當為決。已生位中，住、異、滅三起用各別，令所相法於一時中所望不同，具有三義。如斯通釋，何理相違？」

Regarding "Furthermore, the three such as stationariness ... or called ruined and ceased?": Below this, the three characteristics such as stationariness are refuted. The present operations of the three characteristics all rely on a single phenomenon; at that time, is this phenomenon called stable, called decaying and altered, or called ruined and ceased? The *Nyāyānusāra* defends: "We shall now resolve this. In the state of having already arisen, the operations initiated by the three—stationariness, alteration, and cessation—are each distinct, causing the characterized phenomenon at one time, in different respects, to possess all three meanings. When explained comprehensively like this, what principle does it contradict?"