俱舍論記 5.200

5.200

「若爾為成至空無我性」者，此下經部難。先約內法為難。若爾，為成空、無我覺，諸法之外應執空、無我性。雖離法外無別空、無我性，而起空、無我覺；何妨離色等無別有生等，而起生等覺？

"If so, in order to establish [...] the nature of emptiness and selflessness": Here below the Sautrāntika objects. First he raises an objection concerning internal dharmas: If so, in order to establish the cognition of emptiness and selflessness, apart from dharmas one ought to posit a nature of emptiness and selflessness. Although apart from dharmas there is no distinct nature of emptiness and selflessness, the cognition of emptiness and selflessness still arises; what prevents the cognition of arising and so forth from arising even though apart from form and so forth there is no distinct arising and so forth?