俱舍論記 6.208

6.208

「云何不許至故言不生」者，說一切有部徵。經部云何不許經言不生者，依此擇滅無生力故，言苦不生。或言不生者，此依擇滅力令苦無生，故言苦不生。或依此擇滅，苦無生故，言擇滅不生。既言依此擇滅，明知有體。

Regarding "Why do you not accept ... therefore it is said not to arise": the Sarvāstivāda questions. Why does the Sautrāntika not accept that the sutra's saying "does not arise" means that on the basis of the power of non-arising in this analytical cessation, suffering is said not to arise? Or, saying "does not arise" means that depending on the power of this analytical cessation suffering is caused not to arise, hence suffering is said not to arise. Or, depending on this analytical cessation, because suffering does not arise, analytical cessation is said to be non-arising. Since it is said "depending on this analytical cessation," it is clearly known that it has an entity.