俱舍論記 8.153

8.153

「謂於一處至依異大故」者，此下別破。就中有四，一約鏡像同處破、二約二像同處破、三約影光同處破、四約近遠別見破。即此第一約鏡像同處破。鏡色及像於一處所竝見現前，若像是實，二色不應同處竝有，各別自依異大種故。既同處有，明像是假。

"That is, in a single place [...] because they depend on different great elements": from here on, the specific refutations. Herein there are four: first, refutation based on mirror and reflection sharing the same place; second, refutation based on two reflections sharing the same place; third, refutation based on shadow and light sharing the same place; fourth, refutation based on near and distant being seen differently. This is the first, refuting based on mirror and reflection sharing the same place. The matter of the mirror and the reflection are both seen present in a single place; if the reflection were real, the two forms could not coexist in the same place, because each separately relies on different great elements. Since they exist in the same place, it is evident that the reflection is nominal.