俱舍論記 8.175

8.175

「若爾云何至無間地獄」者，無中有家引經為難。若有中有，何故經言現身顛墮無間地獄？魔羅，名度使。度使，此言毀壞。魔羅，此言殺者。故《婆沙》一百二十五云「羯落迦孫馱佛訶叱度使魔羅，應時彼魔陷入地獄。曾聞彼佛將一侍者名曰志遠，入婆羅村次第乞食。時魔度使化作小年，擲石遙打。侍者頭破血流被面，隨佛後行。時佛右旋如象王顧，見如是事訶叱魔言：『汝何非分造斯惡業。』魔時業盡，便墮地獄。」解云：釋迦佛魔王名波旬，羯洛迦孫馱佛魔王名度使。

Regarding the passage: "If so, how is it that... the Avīci hell?": Those who deny the intermediate state cite a sūtra to raise an objection. If there is an intermediate state, why does the sūtra state that one falls headlong in one's present body into the Avīci hell? Māra is called Dūṣī. Dūṣī here means "destroyer." Māra here means "killer." Hence, Mahāvibhāṣā 125 states: "When the Buddha Krakucchanda scolded Dūṣī Māra, that Māra immediately sank into hell. It is told that this Buddha took an attendant named Vidhura to enter a brāhmaṇa village on sequential alms-round. At that time, Dūṣī Māra transformed into a young boy and threw a stone from afar to hit him. The attendant's head was fractured and blood covered his face as he walked behind the Buddha. The Buddha turned to the right like an elephant king looking back, saw this event, and scolded the Māra, saying: 'How could you commit such an evil deed beyond your station?' At that moment the Māra's karma was exhausted, and he fell into hell." The explanation says: Śākyamuni Buddha's Māra-king was named Pāpīyān, while Krakucchanda Buddha's Māra-king was named Dūṣī.