俱舍論疏 8.204

8.204

論「若爾云何至無間地獄」，大眾部等引契經證無中有也。總有三經，此即第一經也。若有中有，因何經說現身顛墜無間地獄？「度使」，此云毀壞。「魔羅」，此云殺者。《婆沙》一百二十五「羯洛迦孫馱佛，將一侍者名曰至遠，入婆羅門村次第乞食。時魔度使化作少年擲石遙打，侍者頭破血流被面，隨佛後行。時佛呵叱魔言：『汝何非分造斯惡業。』魔時業盡便墜地獄。」

[On the] Śāstra's [words], "If so, how is it that... Avīci hell?": The Mahāsāṃghika and others cite a sūtra to prove there is no intermediate existence (antarābhava). There are three sūtras in all, and this is the first sūtra. If there were an intermediate existence, why would the sūtra state that one falls directly in one's present body into the Avīci hell? "Dūṣī" translates as "ruiner". "Māra" translates as "killer". The Vibhāṣā, fascicle 125, states: "The Buddha Krakucchanda, taking an attendant named Vidura, entered a Brahmin village to beg for food in succession. At that time, the Māra Dūṣī manifested as a youth, threw a stone from afar and struck him; the attendant's head was broken and blood covered his face as he walked behind the Buddha. The Buddha then scolded Māra, saying: 'How could you commit such an evil karma beyond your measure?' At that moment, Māra's karma was exhausted, and he immediately plunged into hell."