俱舍論記 9.37

9.37

「豈不中有至轉受相似」者，論主破。豈不中有必無與生有眾同分別，一業引故。何可言轉受相似？

[On the passage] 'Does not the intermediate existence... how can it be said to change to a similar [species]?': the treatise master refutes this. Does not intermediate existence necessarily lack distinction in genus-similarity (nikāyasabhāga) from the rebirth-existence, because they are projected by a single karma? How could it be said to change to take a similar [species]?