俱舍論疏 1.211

1.211

論「如世尊說至惱壞如箭中」，第二引文證也。變壞即是可惱壞義。引法救〈義品〉中頌證，可知。《婆沙》三十四云「釋迦菩薩為多求王貪海外國故說此頌。」廣如彼說。《婆沙》九十七云「問：變與壞有何差別？答：變者，顯示細無常法。壞者，顯示麁無常法。云云多釋。」問：今此中釋變壞名色，同《婆沙》釋變壞不？答：此不同也。變即壞也，如說變礙，礙即變故，不可有礙而無變、有變而無礙也。

[The text of the] Treatise states: "As the World-Honoured One said: [...] afflicted and destroyed like being struck by an arrow," which is the second [section], citing a textual attestation. Deterioration means precisely being liable to affliction and destruction. It cites a verse from the *Arthavargīya* by Dharmatrāta as attestation, as can be known. Fascicle 34 of the *Vibhāṣā* states: "The Bodhisattva Śākya spoke this verse for King Bahuprapañca (Duoxiu/Duoqiu), who craved overseas kingdoms." It is extensively as explained there. Fascicle 97 of the *Vibhāṣā* states: "Question: What difference is there between alteration and destruction? Answer: Alteration demonstrates subtle impermanence. Destruction demonstrates gross impermanence. [There are] many explanations of this kind." Question: In this passage, does the explanation of deterioration as the definition of matter (rūpa) agree with the *Vibhāṣā*'s explanation of alteration and destruction? Answer: It does not agree. Here, alteration is itself destruction, just as when one speaks of alterability and resistance, resistance is itself alteration; there cannot be resistance without alteration, nor alteration without resistance.