俱舍論疏 10.140

10.140

「論曰至唯是有漏」，此述唯有漏也。《正理》釋云「所以者何？長養有故。無漏諸法與此相違。有說：近行有情皆有，無漏不然，故非近行。有說：聖道任運而轉故、順無相界故，非近行體，近行與此體相違故。」

[On the Śāstra's statement:] 'The Śāstra says [up to] they are solely with outflows', this states that they are solely with outflows. The *Nyāyānusāra* explains: 'Why is this so? Because they nurture existence. Outflow-free dharmas are contrary to this. Some say: Mental investigations are possessed by all sentient beings, but the outflow-free is not so, hence they are not mental investigations. Some say: Because the noble path proceeds spontaneously and accords with the signless realm, it is not of the nature of an investigation; mental investigations have a nature contrary to this.'