俱舍論疏 10.224

10.224

論「此名與義至自所分別」，論主破。得順決擇分名贍部異生，無所憑據。既無文證，即是《婆沙》自所分別。《婆沙》一百三十引經與此有少異，引經雖別大意皆同，然釋贍部洲異生有異。

On the treatise's statement, "This name and meaning ... is their own discrimination": the treatise master refutes it. Calling one who has attained the aids to penetration an ordinary person of Jambū has no basis. Since there is no textual proof, it is merely the Vibhāṣā's own discrimination. The citation of the sūtra in fascicle 130 of the Vibhāṣā has a slight difference from this; although the cited sūtras differ, the general meaning is the same, yet the explanation of the ordinary person of Jambudvīpa differs.