俱舍論疏 10.5

10.5

論「若爾無明應是眼等」，難也。若體非明名曰無明，眼等六根、色等六境，除無漏明，竝體非明，應名無明。

The treatise says: "If so, ignorance should be the eyes and the rest." This is an objection. If its entity being non-clarity is named ignorance, then the six sense faculties such as the eye, and the six sense fields such as visible form—excluding undefiled clarity—are all entities that are not clarity, and should therefore be named ignorance.