俱舍論疏 10.96
俱舍論疏 10.96
- Language
- Classical Chinese
10.96
論「若爾便壞至心品恒俱」，有部出過。觸之與受是大地法，彼定一切心品恒俱，如何說言有心無觸、有心無受？
On the Śāstra's statement: "If so, then it destroys ... constantly co-existent in mental states": the Sarvāstivādin points out the fallacy. Contact and feeling are omnipresent mental factors; they are definitely and constantly co-existent in all mental states. How can you say that there is mind without contact, or mind without feeling?
Translations (1)
- English (machine translation) — English, machine translation