俱舍論疏 11.20

11.20

論「謂必無容至法滅法生」，出違理也。此意欲說金之與器體性無別，如何說有別法是常？別法生滅，謂冥諦常，二十三諦是無常也。

The commentary presents what conflicts with reason: "Namely, it is entirely impossible... an attribute perishes and an attribute arises." The intention here is to say that between gold and the vessel there is no difference in essence; how could one say that an attribute apart [from it] is permanent, while another attribute arises and perishes? That is, the unmanifest principle (pradhāna) is permanent, while the twenty-three principles are impermanent.