俱舍論疏 13.192

13.192

論「若據勝義至故無有過」，答也。據義不同，立名有異。若以行苦極不安穩，一切有漏皆是不善。若不招果及招愛果，別立為善及名無記。據義既別，過失便無。

The treatise says: "If considered from the ultimate standpoint [...] therefore there is no fault." This is an answer. Distinct names are established according to different meanings. If considered in terms of the suffering of conditioning being utterly insecure, all contaminated dharmas are unwholesome. If they do not incur a retribution, or if they incur an agreeable retribution, they are separately established as wholesome or named indeterminate. Since the meanings are distinct, there is no fault.