俱舍論疏 13.210

13.210

論「無如是過失如非善不善」，釋前難也。大種因心起，不成善、不善。大種見所斷心起，非見所斷。此有何失？

The treatise says: "There is no such fault, just as they are neither wholesome nor unwholesome." This resolves the previous challenge. Primary elements arise due to the mind, yet they do not become wholesome or unwholesome. The primary elements arise from a mind abandoned through seeing, yet they are not abandoned through seeing. What fault is there in this?