俱舍論疏 15.30

15.30

論「若爾有情至於理不然」，重破釋也。若謂生草後枯不同故戒無減者，有情般涅槃已，既無前性，如何不減？此是論主述古問答。《雜心論》中亦同此論。

On the Śāstra's: "If so, sentient beings... in principle this is not correct", this refutes the explanation again. If one claims that because grass later withers and is different, the precepts do not decrease, then when a sentient being enters parinirvāṇa, since their previous nature no longer exists, how could there not be a decrease? This is the author of the treatise recounting an ancient question and answer. The Samyuktābhidharmahṛdaya-śāstra is also identical to this treatise.