俱舍論疏 17.86

17.86

論「北俱盧洲至無惡意樂故」，明意三不善業道唯成就不現行。他物己想名貪業道。既不攝我所，故無貪也。身、心剛強欲惱害他名為嗔恚。既身、心柔軟，無惱害事，故無嗔也。不信因果作惡意樂名為邪見。無惡意樂，無邪見也。此三離欲捨故。北洲無離欲，故定有成就。

The passage of the śāstra from "In Uttarakuru" up to "because there is no unwholesome intention" clarifies that the three mental unwholesome courses of action are only possessed and not currently active. To conceive of another's property as one's own is called the course of action of covetousness. Since they do not grasp anything as "mine", there is no covetousness. When body and mind are harsh and one desires to afflict and harm others, this is called malice. Since body and mind are pliant and there is nothing afflicting or harmful, there is no malice. Disbelieving in cause and effect and forming an unwholesome intention is called wrong view. Having no unwholesome intention, there is no wrong view. These three are abandoned through freedom from desire. Since Uttarakuru lacks freedom from desire, they are definitely possessed.