俱舍論疏 19.121

19.121

論「若爾何故至非我亦然」，外難。若倒四，何故經說倒有十二？常等四倒皆有想、心、見三種倒故。

On the treatise's: "If so, why […] and non-self is also like this?" an external objection says: If inversions are four, why does the sūtra state that there are twelve inversions? Because the four inversions of permanence and so forth each have the three inversions of perception (saṃjñā), mind (citta), and view (dṛṣṭi).