俱舍論疏 19.131

19.131

論「若爾」，已下有三節：一論主引慶喜頌難、二引餘部釋、三通前引經證十二倒是見諦斷。論主不許有部十二倒唯見斷故，所以不救。

On the treatise's: "If so," from here down there are three sections: first, the author of the treatise cites the verse of Ānanda to object; second, citing the explanation of other schools; third, resolving the earlier citation of the sūtra to prove that the twelve inversions are abandoned by seeing the truths. Because the author of the treatise does not accept that the Sarvāstivādin twelve inversions are abandoned only by seeing, he therefore does not defend [them].