俱舍論疏 19.222

19.222

論「如何捨置而立記名」，已下問答分別。先難第四記。准前三記，以答為記。既言捨置，即是不答，如何名記？

Regarding the treatise passage: "How can setting aside be established with the name of an answer?": below is a distinguishing through questions and answers. First, it challenges the fourth answer. Following the previous three answers, answering is regarded as an answer. Since it is said to be 'setting aside', that is just not answering; how can it be called an answer?